NOLAmotion Blog

August 4, 2009

Damage Continues at City Park

Stately City Park Oak damaged by construction to build concrete forms.

Stately City Park Oak damaged by construction to build concrete forms.

Special note: I want to apologize if this post ruffles feathers. I admit that I am frustrated. I feel like I’m watching a loved one being assaulted and I’m supposed to be diplomatic and say, “please stop hitting her.” I pray that I find the inner-peace, wisdom and tact to evolve into a more effective and less-pointed advocate for a better world. For  now, however, this is what I’ve thrown out there to try to find “light in the darkness of insanity” to quote Nick Lowe. I only want the best for City Park and our precious Louisiana. SP

Here are the gory details:

Well paid City Park designers, contractors and staffers continue to abuse and kill the precious live oaks under their stewardship. The Great Lawn project, part of the park’s Master Plan, is currently under construction. Just as with the Pavillion of the Two Sisters, a project that killed nearly a half dozen trees with at least one still barely holding on; and, with the loss of trees in the Sculpture Garden ongoing, all due to bad planning and implementation that failed to properly protect the soil and delicate root systems of the trees, the park is in trouble.

As I said in a previous post, City Park is being paved over. Already, an acre has been slathered with a suffocating coat of toxic asphalt. The Master Plan calls for many more acres to be encased in life-starving, impermeable concrete and asphalt because too many people in charge don’t know readily available procedures for Best Management Practices for a public park.

As I’ve noted, New Orleans City Park should be the green heart of the area. It should be the leader in sustainability and green principles to which we all turn to learn about and witness how humans properly manage the natural spaces our parks represent. After witnessing the construction of the Big Lake project and it’s poor choice in materials, tree selection and placement, and water management strategies–which connect to all these issues–I believe the park is in the hands of people who are reshaping it in ways that reflect the mindset of a bygone and downright ignorant time.

Here’s a letter I sent today to several people involved in the operations and oversight of City Park:

Hello:

I am writing to urge you to act swiftly to prevent further damage to live oaks in the park; and, to add appropriate arborists and local green/sustainable design experts to the paid teams developing and implementing the park’s Master Plan.

Apparently, the overall planner for the Great Lawn project designed it to include concrete structures around the base of the large live oak across from the Peristyle. The design does not take into account the needs of the tree. Damage is happening now, with large areas deep under the canopy dug-out, lined with gravel and framed for concrete. Additionally, there is a trenched square nearly a foot deep under the canopy, cut across the roots.

As a lifelong advocate for live oaks, a recently trained Parkway Partners/Louisiana Urban Forestry Council Certified Citizen Forester; and, having learned Best Management Practices at Jefferson Tree School, a continuing education program for arborists, I know that the top 18 inches of soil are the most critical to the health of live oaks. The photos show the “improvements” underway have removed the top layer of soil and deeply trenched a section, cutting vital roots.

This is clearly a case of destructive design and construction that should have been stopped at several stages of the process.

With the heat, drought and now root damage,  this tree will suffer significant die-off from which it will never fully recover. I believe you should immediately bring in a local live oak expert such as Scott Courtright or Tom Campbell to evaluate and try to remediate the damage already done.

It is time for City Park to stop using impermeable hardscapes that suffocate the soil, kill the trees, increase flooding and erosion, and speed pollutants into our precious waterways. No more impermeable concrete or toxic asphalt!

In researching this situation I learned an important fact regarding landscape architects: their degree does not require them to be arborists.

To me, this explains many things regarding how and why trees have been damaged in City Park.

Trees seem to be chosen by the park’s go-to landscape architect with appearance superseding appropriateness. Paving systems are designed and built without an arborist’s understanding of their impact. This is not in line with Best Management Practices for native flora, water management, enhancement of the flyway and wildlife, or Low Impact Design. Any number of people in our area are experts on these matters. Some of them are cc’d in this email.

This is not a job for volunteers. Well paid contractors–using taxpayer funding and donations of people who assume we’re using BMPs–are currently creating these destructive actions. It’s past time to include paid local experts who can help the park become the green leader we all need and deserve.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

City Park oak damaged by trenching under canopy for concrete form.

City Park oak damaged by trenching under canopy for concrete form.

City Park oak being damaged by construction of concrete forms for Great Lawn project.

City Park oak being damaged by construction of concrete forms for Great Lawn project.

Update on concrete form as of Thursday, August 6. Probably going to be some kind of iconic Great Lawn fixture or sign. So this oak is going to end up looking like an amputee as it dies-off thanks to this unbelievably stupid implementation of the design.

Update on concrete form as of Thursday, August 6. Probably going to be some kind of iconic Great Lawn fixture or sign. So this oak is going to end up looking like an amputee as it dies-off thanks to this unbelievably stupid implementation of the design.

About these ads

4 Comments »

  1. [...] City Park is being paved over. But it’s all part of a Master Plan so don’t worry or anything. [...]

    Pingback by Suspect Device: The Blog » NOLA City Park(ing Lot) — August 6, 2009 @ 9:04 am | Reply

  2. Not all landscape architects are insensitive to trees. As a matter of fact, many of us work very hard to preserve, restore, and enhance existing trees and other vegetation — particularly historic live oaks and vegetative habitat for wildlife.

    Everyone needs to stop using the word “sustainable” if they don’t actually practice it of even know what it means. New Orleans is my hometown. I grew up enjoying every park of the park. I worked on the Master Plan for City Park back in the early 1980s. I worked on the NEA funded national design competition for the Botanical Garden in the mid 1980s. This is an amazing place, an amazing treasure.

    Now that there is finally some money to restore and enhance City Park, we need to be sure it is done right — using best management practices for sustainable design. Otherwise we might as well pave another interstate highway through the middle of it like we did in the 1960s. I watched that happen too.

    Comment by Dana Brown — August 6, 2009 @ 4:19 pm | Reply

  3. Thanks, Dana. Your thoughts and philosophy are exactly what we need to do the job right.

    Stewardship is a huge responsibility. The park is not being treated with the kind of reverence, caution and foresight that reflects a deep understanding of the ecology of the space or of the life cycle of the live oaks.

    This is not rocket science. Techniques for developing and building in the proximity of large live oaks have been around for decades. More than 40 years ago, a 10 story bank building and parking lot were built next to a 400+ year old oak in Lafayette. Elaborate systems were developed to prevent damage during construction and to maintain the massive oak. That tree is still thriving. On the LSU campus, permeable brick systems allow sidewalks and other people-friendly additions to the landscape without harming the oaks. It’s not hard or expensive. And it’s how we must proceed. When it comes to the older trees, such as this one, there can be no excuses and no compromises.

    If this were the first time the trees were harmed in the past 10 years, I’d be more inclined to forgiveness. But after losing stately live oaks to the construction of the Pavilion of the Two Sisters (and some are still dying) and the obvious die-back that is happening due to the construction of the Sculpture Garden, this latest assault is inexcusable.

    A crime against our cultures, our history and our future has been committed in City Park. It’s time for an investigation.

    Comment by nolamotion — August 6, 2009 @ 7:41 pm | Reply

  4. [...] and repulsive dinner sometimes. After sending staff, board members and Friends of City Park a still-unanswered correspondence about how the new Great Lawn project was damaging one of the older trees in the park, these signs [...]

    Pingback by City Park of N.O.: Live Oak Destruction Area « NOLAmotion Blog — August 17, 2009 @ 12:52 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 775 other followers

%d bloggers like this: